 |
 The dedicated p2p hubs such as The Pirate Bay and its associated, more peripheral sites (see below for a detailed list) can be said to adopt a publicly visible stance, supportive of unrestricted file-sharing. Moreover, they become actualized, spatially configured sites from which one can conduct actual file-sharing operations. It is in their interest to remain operational and to cater for a wide user base, not least since some of them carry adverts and have significant running costs. Thus, it makes sense to see these establishments as not only relying on activist, countercultural modes of agency for their making and upkeep, but as also decidedly strategic endeavours, with a ‘mainstream’ aim in terms of genres and availability, combined with an aim for permanence in their infrastructure. 
|
|
|
For the Good of the Net: The Pirate Bay as a Strategic Sovereign
In this essay I argue that as peer-to-peer (p2p)-based file-sharing increasingly becomes the norm for media acquisition among the general Internet public, entities such as The Pirate Bay and associated quasi-institutional entities such as Piratbyrån, Zeropaid, TorrentFreak, etc. have begun to appear less as a reactive force (i.e. ‘breaking the rules’) and more as a proactive one (‘setting the rules’). In providing platforms for sharing and for voicing dissent towards the established entertainment industry, the increasing autonomy gained by these piratical actors becomes more akin to the concept of ‘positive liberty’ than to a purely ‘negative,’ reactive one.

January 2009
|